I must say that I am opposed to intermeeting moves in general in the absence of some compelling new piece of information of the sort that we confronted in the fall of 1998 or some other totally unexpected shock. In my view, intermeeting moves create the expectation going forward, for many months or quarters to come, that an intermeeting move might be considered. That adds to the riskiness of the short-run trading environment in the markets, including the equity market. The presumption is that with greater risk in the market, prices will tend to be lower and expected yields have to be higher to compensate for the greater risk. So I'm concerned that an intermeeting move in the near future would simply create more problems for us going forward. I don't think it matters for the longer-run course of the economy whether rates are moved down now or on May 15th. But an intermeeting move does produce an environment of greater uncertainty about the way in which we will proceed in the period ahead. So, I must say that I am very opposed to an intermeeting move in the absence of compelling new information.